Anglo Conformity: A Theory Of Assimilation Essay

Anglo conformity is one of the assimilation theories linked to the status and proven the fact that foreigners would study English, and adhere to various traditions, institutions, and ideals as a way of submission to the critical new Anglo-American culture and the broader Anglo-Saxon majority. To clarify what it means to be an American, AMERICA, created by Western settlers, does develop concepts. Most immigrants made attempts to become U.S. residents by Anglo-conforming assimilation style in their quest. Immigrants ‘ social values and practices are evolving to suit English vocabulary, American culture, and community ceremonies. The Anglo-conformity model has been used as a reinforcement of the 1924 immigration action as more and more immigrants poured into the U.S.

A typical example of assimilation of Anglo-conformity was the creation of country-wide restrictions for foreign countries in Northwestern Europe, which excludes Asian immigrants (China Exclusion Act of 1882). These conditions for refugees to give up their identity to retain the homogeneous American helped to acculturate. Still, systemic assimilation was insufficient due to intermarriages between large and minority groups.

THE MELTING POT IDEOLOGY

The idea was applied to the creation of moral culture in the Utopian visions of America. The perfect modern republic was brought about by the convergence of various cultures, races, ethnic groups, and nationalities through an idealized phase. This method is also known as cultural assimilation or acculturation by which different cultures and ethnicities are merged to achieve a unified American culture. In the late 19th century, the rise in the number of European immigrants to the United States was broad and substantial.

Large numbers of ethnic communities such as Poles, Italians, and Jews arrived at the beginning of the 1890s that were to combine their cultures into the racial melting pot, thereby embracing American lifestyles. These conditions were seen as unacceptable and prompted many heated debates, particularly from detractors of this process. As a response, the U.S. installed a significant number of legal immigration guidelines (the 1920s), limiting the number of immigrants via country-wide quotas.

IDEAS OF CULTURAL PLURALISM

American liberalism has undergone a dominant objective since the beginning of the Twentieth century, in that it became essential to assimilate minorities, particularly immigrants, into unique American life. Cultural pluralism is viewed as an equal, democratic, fair, and accessible principle in the community by liberalists. Within a decentralized structure with diverse communities with various values, beliefs, and traditions, the philosophy promotes mutual coexistence. The massive number of immigrants to the United States culminated in tremendous conflicts over the political system and the whole American society. Nevertheless, with problems like world wars and resistance to colonialism, increased levels of intolerance have been addressed through cultural and racial diversity. This ethnic pluralism has gained support in American culture as time goes by. For example, in 2003, Congress founded the Homeland Security Office of Citizenship. Its mission is to restore and highlight citizenship requirements, such as shared values and common public, private information.

1943 MAGNUSON ACT

The 1849 California Gold Rush saw the Chinese coming to America in large numbers. To regulate this phenomenon, through the introduction of the Chinese Exclusion Act, the limitation on free immigration was dramatically enforced. Chinese workers, whether competent or unqualified, could not enter the U.S. for the next 10 years, and could impose penalties on criminals for expulsion and detention.

Nevertheless, the 1943 Magnuson Act overturned the Chinese Exclusion Act permitting 105 Chinese immigrants to be entitled to the national quota every year. After the enactment of the act, Chinese immigrants still residing in the U.S. were allowed to be naturalized citizens. The 1965 Immigration Act allowed a vast number of Chinese immigrants to come into the country.

RACIAL NATURALIZATION BY DEVON CARBADO

It explains how all non-Americans became Americanized via a broad social activity. However, racial classification plays an integral part in politically comprehensible non-Americans. The method of naturalization used for all people in the United States to become citizens is racism. The cycle of adoption has a system within which laws prescribe the requirements of nationality. Devon established an approach by which attempts to combat this naturalization process became unsuccessful in terms of being of Black origin and needing to endure the process of Americanization. He describes how, in the context of interactions with police, black men experienced severe problems. Living in a black-dominated neighbourhood in Los Angeles, he had several police conflicts over allegations of being a robber, drug dealer, criminal, and many other illegalities. For example, while driving their newly acquired vehicle, he and his brother were stopped by police and subjected to unjustified interrogations. This was an indication of Americanization implicit in black American cultural subjectivity. Daven argues in analyzing forms of racial naturalization that the citizenship process is a way of producing American citizenship. Second, when applied in social terms, this naturalization process leads to American racial identities. Therefore, racial development goes hand in hand with Americanization. They have American identity on one hand and American citizenship, on the other, based on inclusion and exclusion. Citizenship is official or legal, while identity is the right to be a race-based representative body. Asian Americans were unable to obtain national identity, and even those who are officially American citizens lack the capacity for recognition.

THE DEVELOPMENT REGARDING THE PACIFIC WAR AS A “RACE WAR”

The Second World War was part of the Pacific War between Asia, the western powers, and Japan. For several reasons, some writers found this conflict to be a “race war.” Concerning this war, the two parties involved showed a significant degree of racism.

First, Japan did behave on a racial basis targeting the British, Americans, and Asian countries that helped the Chinese and opposed their control. Second, the Americans harboured admiration for the Chinese during this time; they were prepared to attack the Japanese due to various brutal campaigns against the Chinese. Due to the Japanese attacks, the widespread publicity of how the Chinese suffered prompted the American altitude to deploy counterattacks. Third, the Japanese were willing to strike them or their territorial possessions with anti-colonial sentiments in comparison to Western countries. The conflict could be further discussed concerning with regard to the human element of country motivations, ideology, and politics based on the above points. Such factors classify the pacific war as a “race war,” which involves rational subordination of policies, enmity, primordial violence, and hatred.

THE IMPACTS OF THE PATRIOT ACT

The United States of America Patriotic Act, which was signed in October 2001, had many clauses that had many consequences on the United States citizens, financial institutions, government security officials, and other people around the world. The terrorist attacks of September 11 primarily influenced the passage, and the act includes significant changes to federal law. There have been many detentions of foreigners, which many find unconstitutional, based on the need for increased security operations. Security crackdowns have threatened blacks, immigrants, Asians, and Arab-origin citizens since its passing into law. Significant numbers of people were arrested on suspicion of being a supporter of terror activities or terrorists. The legislation permitting law enforcement officers to perform home, residential, and business searches without residents/owners’ consent or permission has generated inconveniences. Some of the laws have had a clear negative impact on the life of people. Despite numerous legal arguments, this is proven by the federal courts, finding that a variety of provisions are illegal.